To compare ocular biometry measured using 4 applanation ultrasonographic biometry devices and evaluate the accuracies of the refractive outcomes after cataract surgery.
MethodsA total of 60 eyes in 60 patients who received cataract surgery were included in the present study. The axial length was measured using applanation ultrasonographic biometry devices (Aviso®, Hi-Scan®, UD-6000®, P37-II®). Additionally, keratometry was measured using an autokeratometer (Topcon KR 8000) and the SRK/T formula was used to calculate intraocular lens (IOL) power. Two months after cataract surgery, the refractive outcome was determined, and results from the 4 different applanation ultrasonographic biometry devices were compared.
ResultsAxial lengths were 23.52 ± 1.45 mm, 23.51 ± 1.04 mm, 23.54 ± 1.58 mm, and 23.52 ± 1.38 mm measured using Aviso®, Hi-Scan®, UD-6000®, and P37-II®, respectively with no statistically significant differences observed ( p = 0.92). The mean absolute error (MAE) of the Aviso®, Hi-Scan®, UD-6000®, and P37-II® was 0.41 ± 0.32 diopter (D), 0.40 ± 0.30 D, 0.36 ± 0.26 D, and 0.39 ± 0.26 D, respectively. The mean numerical error (MNE) was 0.39 ± 0.37 D, 0.36 ± 0.32 D, 0.26 ± 0.29 D, and 0.38 ± 0.32 D, respectively. The differences between the 4 different applanation ultrasonographic biometry devices were not statistically significant ( p = 0.90, p = 0.81).
ConclusionsThe ocular biometric measurements and prediction of postoperative refraction using Aviso®, Hi-Scan®, UD-6000®, P37-II® showed no significant differences.