首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月30日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Comparison of surgical conditions during propofol or desflurane anesthesia for endoscopic sinus surgery
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Cho, Kwangrae ; Lee, Jin Young ; Park, Sung Kuk
  • 期刊名称:Korean Journal of Anesthesiology
  • 印刷版ISSN:2005-6419
  • 出版年度:2012
  • 卷号:63
  • 期号:4
  • 页码:302-307
  • DOI:10.4097/kjae.2012.63.4.302
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists,
  • 摘要:Background

    Reduction of intraoperative bleeding is necessary to achieve the ideal surgical field for the endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). Intraoperative intra nasal bleeding is influenced by various anesthetics. This study compared surgical field condition between propofol/remifentanil (PR) based anesthesia and desflurane/remifentanil (DR) based anesthesia.

    Methods

    American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class I or II patients undergoing ESS were randomly assigned to group PR (n = 36) or group DR (n = 32). The extent of the preoperative surgical lesion was classified as high (> 12) and low (≤ 12) Lund-Mackay (LM) scores according to the computed tomography findings. The target mean blood pressure was maintained at 70-80 mmHg. Only one surgeon was involved in rating the visibility of the surgical field on a numeric rating scale (NRS) every 10 minutes.

    Results

    There was a different surgical field grade from PR to DR. The mean (SD) surgical field score of NRS for the PR and DR was 2.3 (0.57) and 2.7 (0.67), respectively (P = 0.006). Especially in the high-LM score patients, the mean (SD) of surgical field score for the PR and DR was 2.4 (0.67) and 3.0 (0.63), respectively (P = 0.012).

    Conclusions

    In the high-LM score patients, PR based anesthesia resulted in better surgical field condition for ESS than DR based anesthesia. In ESS, PR based anesthesia is considered to be helpful.

  • 关键词:desflurane; propofol; remifentanil; Sinusitis
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有