首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月13日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale: A Study of Reliability and Validity
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Türkan ÖZCAN ; Erkan KURU ; Yasir ŞAFAK
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research
  • 印刷版ISSN:2146-9490
  • 出版年度:2013
  • 卷号:2
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:25-33
  • 出版社:International Medical Journal Management and Indexing System
  • 摘要:Objective: Delusions are fixed wrong beliefs based on false inference and resistant to change. Most prominent feature of delusions is patients have no insight about their delusional belief. Psychiatry benefits from the scales that evaluate the presence of delusion, the strength of delusion and insight. Out of many scales The Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale (BABS) is one of the most common scales that used in psychiatry. The aim of our study is to test reliability and validity of BABS’ Turkish version in Turkish population. Method: BABS is translated from English to Turkish by two clinicians and administered to 30 patients with obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), and 29 patients with schizophrenia. In order to evaluate inter-rater reliability, BABS was administered by two different clinicians. In order to evaluate test- retest reliability, BABS was applied to 57 patients one week later. To examine BABS Turkish discriminant validity, we used Beck Cognitive Insight Scale, Schedule for Assesing the Three Components of Insight Scale and insight item of Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale . In order to test construct validity, factor analysis was done. Results: Interrater reliability (Kappa =0.54-0.83) and test–retest reliability (r=0.80-0.96, p
  • 关键词:Delusion; reliability; validity
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有