We show an exponential gap between communication complexity and information complexity for boolean functions, by giving an explicit example of a partial function with information complexity O ( k ) , and distributional communication complexity 2 k . This shows that a communication protocol for a partial boolean function cannot always be compressed to its internal information. By a result of Braverman, our gap is the largest possible. By a result of Braverman and Rao, our example shows a gap between communication complexity and amortized communication complexity, implying that a tight direct sum result for distributional communication complexity of boolean functions cannot hold, answering a long standing open problem.

Our techniques build on [GKR14], that proved a similar result for relations with very long outputs (double exponentially long in k ). In addition to the stronger result, the current work gives a simpler proof, benefiting from the short output length of boolean functions.

Another (conceptual) contribution of our work is the relative discrepancy method, a new rectangle-based method for proving communication complexity lower bounds for boolean functions, powerful enough to separate information complexity and communication complexity.