首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月04日 星期三
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The validity and precision of the leicester cough questionnaire in COPD patients with chronic cough
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Farida F Berkhof ; Lisenka N Boom ; Nynke E ten Hertog
  • 期刊名称:Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
  • 印刷版ISSN:1477-7525
  • 电子版ISSN:1477-7525
  • 出版年度:2012
  • 卷号:10
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:4
  • DOI:10.1186/1477-7525-10-4
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:A validated instrument to assess the effects of chronic cough on health status in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is currently not available. The Leicester Cough Questionnaire (LCQ) is a cough-specific health status questionnaire which is originally validated for a population of general patients presenting with chronic cough. We examined the psychometric performance of the LCQ in patients with COPD and chronic productive cough. Concurrent validity, internal consistency, reproducibility and responsiveness were determined. The St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) and the Short Form-36 (SF-36) were used as external criteria. Questionnaires were completed at the start of the study. After 2 and 12 weeks the LCQ was repeated, together with a global rating of change. In total 54 patients were included. Concurrent validity analysis showed significant correlations between corresponding domains of the LCQ and the SGRQ (rs -0.31 to -0.60). Corresponding domains of the LCQ and the SF-36 showed weaker correlations (rs 0.04 to 0.41). Internal consistency was adequate for two of the three domains (Cronbach's α 0.74 - 0.86). Test-retest reliability in stable patients was high (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.79 - 0.93). The mean difference after two weeks was 0.73 (± 1.75). Responsiveness analysis indicated that the LCQ was able to detect changes after 12 weeks. The LCQ is a valid, reliable, responsive instrument to measure health status in COPD patients with chronic productive cough. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01071161
  • 关键词:LCQ ; COPD ; validity ; cough ; health status
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有