文章基本信息

标题：Problems and issues in implementing innovative curriculum in the developing countries: the Pakistani experience
本地全文：下载
作者：Syeda Kauser Ali ; Lubna A Baig
期刊名称：BMC Medical Education
印刷版ISSN：1472-6920
出版年度：2012
卷号：12
期号：1
页码：1-8
DOI：10.1186/1472-6920-12-31
出版社：BioMed Central
摘要：The Government of Pakistan identified 4 medical Colleges for introduction of COME, one from each province. Curriculum was prepared by the faculty of these colleges and launched in 2001 and despite concerted efforts could not be implemented. The purpose of this research was to identify the reasons for delay in implementation of the COME curriculum and to assess the understanding of the stakeholders about COME. Mixed methods study design was used for data collection. In-depth interviews, mail-in survey questionnaire, and focus group discussions were held with the representatives of federal and provincial governments, Principals of medical colleges, faculty and students of the designated colleges. Rigor was ensured through independent coding and triangulation of data. The reasons for delay in implementation differed amongst the policy makers and faculty and included thematic issues at the institutional, programmatic and curricular level. Majority (92% of the faculty) felt that COME curriculum couldn’t be implemented without adequate infrastructure. The administrators were willing to provide financial assistance, political support and better coordination and felt that COME could improve the overall health system of the country whereas the faculty did not agree to it. The paper discusses the reasons of delay based on findings and identifies the strategies for curriculum change in established institutions. The key issues identified in our study included frequent transfer of faculty of the designated colleges and perceived lack of: · Continuation at the policy making level · Communication between the stakeholders · Effective leadership.
关键词：Community-oriented medical education;Curriculum development;Educational innovation;Change management;Evaluation of curriculum;Educational leadership