首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月27日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Martin Stocker ; Lynda Menadue ; Suzan Kakat
  • 期刊名称:BMC Emergency Medicine
  • 印刷版ISSN:1471-227X
  • 电子版ISSN:1471-227X
  • 出版年度:2013
  • 卷号:13
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:22
  • DOI:10.1186/1471-227X-13-22
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:

    Background

    Teamwork is a critical component during critical events. Assessment is mandatory for remediation and to target training programmes for observed performance gaps.

    Methods

    The primary purpose was to test the feasibility of team-based self-monitoring of crisis resource management with a validated teamwork assessment tool. A secondary purpose was to assess item-specific reliability and content validity in order to develop a modified context-optimised assessment tool.

    We conducted a prospective, single-centre study to assess team-based self-monitoring of teamwork after in-situ inter-professional simulated critical events by comparison with an assessment by observers. The Mayo High Performance Teamwork Scale (MHPTS) was used as the assessment tool with evaluation of internal consistency, item-specific consensus estimates for agreement between participating teams and observers, and content validity.

    Results

    105 participants and 58 observers completed the MHPTS after a total of 16 simulated critical events over 8 months. Summative internal consistency of the MHPTS calculated as Cronbach’s alpha was acceptable with 0.712 for observers and 0.710 for participants. Overall consensus estimates for dichotomous data (agreement/non-agreement) was 0.62 (Cohen’s kappa; IQ-range 0.31-0.87). 6/16 items had excellent (kappa > 0.8) and 3/16 good reliability (kappa > 0.6). Short questions concerning easy to observe behaviours were more likely to be reliable. The MHPTS was modified using a threshold for good reliability of kappa > 0.6. The result is a 9 item self-assessment tool (TeamMonitor) with a calculated median kappa of 0.86 (IQ-range: 0.67-1.0) and good content validity.

    Conclusions

    Team-based self-monitoring with the MHPTS to assess team performance during simulated critical events is feasible. A context-based modification of the tool is achievable with good internal consistency and content validity. Further studies are needed to investigate if team-based self-monitoring may be used as part of a programme of assessment to target training programmes for observed performance gaps.

  • 关键词:Teamwork; Self-assessment; Mayo high performance teamwork scale; Resuscitation; Patient safety
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有