文章基本信息

标题：Book Review
本地全文：下载
作者：Veselin Draskovic
期刊名称：Montenegrin Journal of Economics
印刷版ISSN：1800-5845
电子版ISSN：1800-6698
出版年度：2012
卷号：8
期号：1
出版社：Economic Laboratory for Transition Research Podgorica
摘要：The book is published in Moscow, Russia. Written in Russian it contains the author's foreword in English given below and represents the original scientific work devoted to the actual problem of macroeco-nomic management. There are two opposite points of view on the problem of economy management: neo-liberal (neo-classical) and gradualistic or dirigismic (institutional). The first approach says that there is a design in a society which distributes resources effectively, providing development in the necessary direction for agents. It is a market. The second approach explains that management in itself centralizes any subsystem, whether it is a firm or national economy and it is an integral element of social system functioning. Contrast-ing of these two approaches in economic science, in my opinion, was the result of misunderstanding of problems and tasks and frequently the essence of management and the processes of economy organiza-tion by the majority of theorists-economists. Not taking into account the factor of management was always a large methodological problem of economic science. A. Marshall in "Principles of Economics" made the defining account of the "management" factor. With such dichotomy, there is also a dichotomy in economics concerning the importance of the state and economic policy instruments, etc as well. The liberal part of economists in Russia, for example, considers that the years of reforms were rather successful, having solved the primary goal. However, the numerical data does not confirm this fact and makes gradualists come to the conclusion that liberals lie after they have destroyed industrial system of the country, lost home market and sharply lowered economy controllability. "The Washington consensus" is associated with liberals, and gradualists are associated with other principles, the so-called "Moscow consensus", in particular