首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月15日 星期日
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Controversy between Financial Economics and Traditional Actuarial Approach to Pension Funding
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:J.S. Adeyele ; O.J. Adelakun
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Emerging Trends in Economics and Management Sciences
  • 电子版ISSN:2141-7024
  • 出版年度:2010
  • 卷号:1
  • 期号:1
  • 出版社:Scholarlink Resource Centre
  • 摘要:The debate between financial economics and traditional actuarial science has continued to attract the attentions of the academics and practitioners from various disciplines around the world. A survey of literature does not produce much consensus between the two sides of the debate. Actuaries largely seek to place value on cash flow stream, whereas financial economists believe market should do that for them since value is subjective while price is objective. The debate focuses on two main issues: the appropriate model used to value pension liabilities, and how pension assets should be invested. The financial economists contend that pension benefits are bond-like and therefore should be valued by reference to a matching bond portfolio. This study considered these issues with a view to reconciling the actuarial methods to financial economics thinking by exploring the four major principles of financial economics in light of actuarial practice
  • 关键词:actuarial practice; financial economics; pension funds; investments
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有