首页    期刊浏览 2024年11月29日 星期五
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS-J)
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Tetsuya Igarashi ; Gen Komaki ; Richard D Lane
  • 期刊名称:BioPsychoSocial Medicine
  • 印刷版ISSN:1751-0759
  • 电子版ISSN:1751-0759
  • 出版年度:2011
  • 卷号:5
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:2
  • DOI:10.1186/1751-0759-5-2
  • 语种:English
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:

    Background

    The Levels of Emotional Awareness Scale (LEAS) was developed to assess five levels of emotional awareness: bodily sensations, action tendencies, single emotions, blends of emotion, and combinations of blends. It is a paper and pencil performance questionnaire that presents 20 emotion-evoking scenes. We developed a Japanese version of the LEAS (LEAS-J), and its reliability and validity were examined.

    Methods

    The LEAS-J level was independently assessed by two researchers who scored each response according to the LEAS scoring manual. High inter-rater reliability and internal consistency were obtained for the LEAS-J. Measures were socioeconomic status, LEAS-J, Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20 (TAS-20), Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI), and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). TAS-20, IRI and NEO-FFI were the measures used to explore the construct validity of LEAS-J, as it was predicted that higher scores on the LEAS-J would be related to fewer alexithymic features, greater empathetic ability, and a greater sense of cooperation with others. Questionnaires were completed by 344 university students.

    Results

    The criterion-referenced validity was determined: a significant negative relationship was found with the externally-oriented thinking scores of TAS-20, and positive relationships were found with fantasy, perspective taking, and empathic concern on IRI and with extraversion, openness to experience, and agreeableness on NEO-FFI.

    Conclusions

    Consistent with our expectations, the findings provide evidence that the LEAS-J has good reliability and validity. In addition, women had significantly higher scores than men on LEAS-J, showing that the gender difference identified in the original LEAS was cross-culturally consistent.

国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有