文章基本信息

标题：Weeding out WikiLeaks (and why it won't work): legislative recognition of public whistleblowing in Australia
本地全文：下载
作者：A J Brown ; John F Kearney Professor of Public Law Griffith University, Australia
期刊名称：Global Media Journal : Australian Edition
印刷版ISSN：1835-2340
出版年度：2011
卷号：05
期号：01
出版社：School of Communication Arts, University of Western Sydney
摘要：Even in midsummer, the historic Ellingham Hall, Norfolk, is a grey place. For Australians used to brighter sunshine year round, it would retain that slight English dinginess even if its most famous resident was not under house arrest. Yet, among the legal problems facing the Australian citizen Julian Assange, the most important challenges are not especially well known. Assange founded WikiLeaks in 2006 as a website dedicated to the secure receipt and anonymous publication of inside information too sensitive or risky for information-holders to release any other way. The bulk if not the entirety of disclosures of public importance since that time were not authorised by the institutions concerned. In other words, as intended, they constitute ‘leaks.’ Questions of when unauthorised disclosure of information is warranted, and by whom and how such judgments are to be made, are not new in democracies that have long wrestled with the public interest value of whistleblowing.2 However, the entry of new media into this territory, spearheaded by WikiLeaks, has brought public whistleblowing to the forefront of international debate as never before. This article reviews key political responses to WikiLeaks, internationally but especially in Assange’s home state of Australia, for their lessons for current and future directions in law reform with respect to public whistleblowing.