期刊名称:Discussion Papers / Ibero America Institute for Economic Research (IAI)
出版年度:2005
卷号:2005
出版社:Ibero America Institute for Economic Research
摘要:The recent focus on ‘pro-poor growth’ led also to an intense
debate on how exactly to define and to measure pro-poor growth. However, all
suggested measures, irrespective whether they use the absolute or the relative
definition of pro-poor growth have in common that they are based on the
anonymity axiom, i.e. they do not distinguish between changes in horizontal and
vertical inequality. That means usual assessments of pro-poor growth look at
distributional changes over time and ignore how specific groups or households
moved. Such a perspective may provide a very incomplete picture given that the
common objective of most studies investigating the pro-poorness of growth is to
test whether specific policy reforms where beneficial to the initially poor or
not. Using panel data from Indonesia and Peru, this paper analyzes and
illustrates empirically the implications of removing the anonymity axiom from
measurements of pro-poor growth. It is shown that postulating anonymity, when
assessing pro-poor growth can lead to misleading conclusions on how a specific
policy affected the incomes of the initially poor. For both countries, the
analysis shows substantial convergence to the mean, which is, at least for the
case of Indonesia, robust to measurement error in the expenditure data.
关键词:Anonymity axiom, pro-poor growth, income mobility, horizontal equity,
inequality, decomposition