期刊名称:CORE Discussion Papers / Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (UCL), Louvain
出版年度:2007
卷号:1
出版社:Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (UCL), Louvain
摘要:In order to rank universities, rather than aggregating the indicators used by the Times
Higher Education Supplement (THES) ¨C using weightings which, though reasonable, are at
the same time arbitrary and inflexible ¨C one can compare universities in terms of
dominance and hence deduce various partial or complete rankings. The resultant
dominance ranking method is presented in this note. Data are recalled in Appendix 1.
Appendix 2 provides full details of the dominance analysis for each university. From this
analysis two listings are derived: (i) a front runners list consisting of 34 ¡°nondominated¡±
universities, (Table 4) and (ii) a (new) ranking of the 200 universities
surveyed by the THES, based on their respective ¡®active-passive dominance¡¯ scores
(Table 5). Concluding remarks bear on limits of the data and of the exercise.