摘要:In order to value non-market goods, economists estimate individuals’ willingness
to pay (WTP) for these goods using revealed or stated preference methods. We
compare these conventional approaches with subjective well-being (SWB), which is
based on individuals’ ratings of their happiness or life satisfaction rather
than on their preferences. In the context of a quasi- experiment in urban
regeneration, we find that monetary estimates from SWB data are significantly
higher than from revealed and stated preference data. Stigma in revealed
preferences, mental accounting in stated preferences and unspecified duration in
SWB ratings might explain some of the difference between the valuation methods.
关键词:willingness to pay, preferences, life satisfaction, subjective well-being,
nonmarket goods