摘要:Two issues related to mapping a multi-sector model into a reduced-form
value-added model are often neglected: the composition of intermediate goods,
and the distinction between value added productivity and gross output
productivity. We demonstrate their quantitative significance for the case of the
well known model of Greenwood, Hercowitz and Krusell (1997), who find that about
60% of economic growth can be attributed to investment-specific technical change
(ISTC). When we recalibrate their model to allow for even a small equipment
share of intermediates, we find that ISTC accounts for almost the entirety of
postwar US growth.