摘要:Recent treatments of the issue of a zero floor on nominal interest rates have
been subject to some important methodological limitations. These include the
assumption of perfect foresight or the introduction of the zero lower bound as
an initial condition or a constraint on the variance of the interest rate,
rather than an occasionally binding non-negativity constraint. This paper
addresses these issues, offering a global solution to a standard dynamic
stochastic sticky-price model with an explicit occasionally binding
non-negativity constraint on the nominal interest rate. It turns out that the
dynamics and sometimes the unconditional means of the nominal rate, inflation,
and the output gap are strongly affected by uncertainty in the presence of the
zero lower bound. Commitment to the optimal rule reduces unconditional welfare
losses to around one-tenth of those achievable under discretionary policy, while
constant price-level targeting delivers losses that are only 60 percent larger
than those under the optimal rule. Even though the unconditional performance of
simple instrument rules is almost unaffected by the presence of the zero lower
bound, conditional on a strong deflationary shock, simple instrument rules
perform substantially worse than the optimal policy.