文章基本信息

标题：THE TRIAL COURT’S SUMMARY DISPOSITION OF THE ACTION IN FAVOR OF INSURANCE COMPANY IS REVERSED AND THE CAUSE IS REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THIS COURT’S PRONOUNCEMENT
本地全文：下载
作者：Robert W. Hayden ; Anthony W. Speck ; Oklahoma City 等
期刊名称：Oklahoma Bar Journal
印刷版ISSN：0030-1655
出版年度：2008
卷号：79
期号：24
页码：8-8
出版社：Oklahoma Bar Association
摘要：Two questions are posed in this controversy for our review: (1) Is Equity Insurance Company’s policy provision that deals with cancellation for nonpayment of a premium ambiguous? If so, did defendant tender proof that would raise a question of fact as to when notice of the policy’s cancellation must be submitted to the insured? (2) Do the terms of the Oklahoma Consumer Credit Protection Code, 14A O.S. 2001 § 4-304,2 apply to insurance agreements in which installment payments for coverage are acceptable? We answer the first question in the negative but reverse the trial court’s judgment on other grounds. Because