摘要:This article explores the implications of the Supreme Court¡¯s
June 2005 decisions involving the public display of the Ten
Commandments. The article first explains that the decisions will do little
to alleviate the confusion that currently exists about the constitutionality
of the public display of religious symbols. The article then focuses on a
major problem with the Court¡¯s Establishment Clause jurisprudence¡ª
viz., that the Court is unwilling to acknowledge the special value of
religion. The article closes with some observations about the opinions of
Justices Scalia and Thomas and suggests that their opinions offer the
prospect of a much-needed reorientation of the Court¡¯s approach to the
Establishment Clause.