摘要:In Marxism and Literature (1977), Raymond Williams argues that writing is in an
important sense always aligned. This sense of alignment, however, may be
distinguished from a sense of chosen commitment,which is “conscious, active, and
open.” Through a close analysis of the early work of the Scottish working-class
writer James Kelman, this essay examines how an ideologically committed writer
learned to refashion the dominant forms of novelistic discourse for his own political
purposes. For Kelman, commitment in writing involves the recognition of the
“distinction between dialogue and narrative as a summation of the political system.”
This distinction was “simply another method of exclusion, of marginalizing and
disenfranchising different peoples, cultures and communities,” Political commitment
thus required Kelman to break successfully with the tradition of “‘working class
authors’ who allowed ‘the voice’ of higher authority to control narrative, the place
where the psychological drama occurred.”