摘要:In Scott (2002) and Congdon (2006), a new method is advanced to
compute posterior probabilities of models under consideration. It is based solely
on MCMC outputs restricted to single models, i.e., it is bypassing reversible jump
and other model exploration techniques. While it is indeed possible to approxi-
mate posterior probabilities based solely on MCMC outputs from single models,
as demonstrated by Gelfand and Dey (1994) and Bartolucci et al. (2006), we show
that the proposals of Scott (2002) and Congdon (2006) are biased and advance sev-
eral arguments towards this thesis, the primary one being the confusion between
model-based posteriors and joint pseudo-posteriors. From a practical point of
view, the bias in Scott's (2002) approximation appears to be much more severe
than the one in Congdon's (2006), the latter being often of the same magnitude
as the posterior probability it approximates, although we also exhibit an example
where the divergence from the true posterior probability is extreme.
关键词:Bayesian model choice, posterior approximation, reversible jump, Markov
Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC), pseudo-priors, unbiasedness, improperty.