摘要:Whenever I try to talk about Baker¡¯s philosophy I find it hard to know where to start. We
disagree about so many things. We even disagree about how to describe each other¡¯s views.
When I read Baker¡¯s description of my views, I find myself wanting to say, ¡°No! that¡¯s not
what I think,¡± or at best, ¡°That¡¯s a misleading and tendentious description of my view.¡±
And when she reads my description of her views, she has precisely the same reaction.
For example, Baker says that ¡°Olson¡¯s ontology doesn¡¯t mention persons¡±1 (or, in
ordinary English, people). That sounds like I deny the existence of people, which I don¡¯t.
The truth behind her shocking headline is that on my view people have the same identity
conditions as certain things that aren¡¯t people: for instance cats.