文章基本信息

标题：Should applicants to Nottingham University Medical School study a non-science A-level? A cohort study
本地全文：下载
作者：Janet Yates ; Jennifer Smith ; David James 等
期刊名称：BMC Medical Education
印刷版ISSN：1472-6920
出版年度：2009
卷号：9
期号：1
页码：1-9
DOI：10.1186/1472-6920-9-5
出版社：BioMed Central
摘要：It has been suggested that studying non-science subjects at A-level should be compulsory for medical students. Our admissions criteria specify only Biology, Chemistry and one or more additional subjects. This study aimed to determine whether studying a non-science subject for A-level is an independent predictor of achievement on the undergraduate medical course. The subjects of this retrospective cohort study were 164 students from one entry-year group (October 2000), who progressed normally on the 5-year undergraduate medical course at Nottingham. Pre-admission academic and socio-demographic data and undergraduate course marks were obtained. T-test and hierarchical multiple linear regression analyses were undertaken to identify independent predictors of five course outcomes at different stages throughout the course. There was no evidence that the choice of science or non-science as the third or fourth A-level subject had any influence on course performance. Demographic variables (age group, sex, and fee status) had some predictive value but ethnicity did not. Pre-clinical course performance was the strongest predictor in the clinical phases (pre-clinical Themes A&B (knowledge) predicted Clinical Knowledge, p < 0.001, and pre-clinical Themes C&D (skills) predicted Clinical Skills, p = < 0.01). This study of one year group at Nottingham Medical School provided no evidence that the admissions policy on A-level requirements should specify the choice of third or fourth subject.
关键词：Clinical Skill;Binary Logistic Regression Model;Hierarchical Multiple Linear Regression;Medical School Performance;Graduate Entry Student