文章基本信息

标题：A Brief Reflection on Open Science
本地全文：下载
作者：Henry Otgaar ; Anna Sagana ; Nina Tupper 等
期刊名称：Psychological Research on Urban Society
印刷版ISSN：2620-3960
电子版ISSN：2615-8582
出版年度：2020
卷号：3
期号：1
页码：1-5
DOI：10.7454/proust.v3i1.85
语种：English
出版社：Universitas Indonesia
摘要：In the past years,the psychological community witnessed an outbreak of failures to replicate well-known psychological findings. These failures have undermined the credibility of the psychological field and have shaken the trust of practicioners and the public to psychological reseach. Some have called this period the replication crisis (e.g.,Maxwell et al.,2015). Others have termed this period the credibility revolution because these failures have caused psychological scientists to critically evaluate their used methodology and statistical apparatus and search for ways to improve them (e.g.,Vazire, 2018). In this reflection,we give a short historical overview of important events that likely caused this credibility revolution. Furthermore, we describe a possible solution to address these failures to replicate psychological findings: Open Science. We discuss the basic idea behind Open Science and provide several recommendations for psychological scientists when designing and conducting psychological studies.