文章基本信息

标题：Village Funds Usage Based on Rural Development and Rural Resilience in Pandeglang District,Banten Province
其他标题：Pemanfaatan Dana Desa Berbasis Perkembangan dan Resiliensi Desa di Kabupaten Pandeglang Provinsi Banten
本地全文：下载
作者：Siti Khoeriyah ; Ernan Rustiadi ; Akhmad Fauzi Syam 等
期刊名称：Tataloka
印刷版ISSN：0852-7458
电子版ISSN：2356-0266
出版年度：2020
卷号：22
期号：2
页码：175-187
DOI：10.14710/tataloka.22.2.175-187
语种：Indonesian
出版社：Diponegoro University
摘要：This study aimed at map village typologies based on the status of rural development and resilience for prepare the guidance village funds usage. Status of rural development was built with 13 indicators and status resilience was built with 10 indicators. The study used secondary data from BPS,wich was PODES 2014 in 326 villages at Pandeglang district. The results showed that 5 villages were categorized as advanced villages,93 villages were categorized as developed villages,177 villages as undeveloped villages,and 52 were categorized as outlying villages. Based on resilience status,there were 16 villages categorized as low resilience villages,239 villages as middle resilence villages,and 71 villages categorized as high resilience villages. Based on the status of development and resileince,4 villages were categorized as typology B (advanced and middle resilience villages),1 village were typology C (advanced and low resiliece villages),4villages were typology D (developed and high resilience villages),79 villages were typology E(developed and middle resilience villages),9 villages were typology F (developed and lowresilience villages),35 villages were typology G (undeveloped and high resilience villages),136were typology H (undeveloped and middle resilience villages),6 villages were typology I(undeveloped and low resilience villages),32 villages were typology J (outlying and high resilience villages),and 20 villages were typology K (outlying and middle resilience villages).
其他摘要：Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memetakan tipologi desa berdasarkan status perkembangan dan status resilensi desa guna memberikan arahan dalam pemanfaatan dana desa. Status perkembangan desa dibangun dengan 13 indikator dan status resiliensi desa dibangun dengan 10 indikator. Penelitian menggunakan data sekunder dari BPS yaitu PODES Tahun 2014 sejumlah 326 desa di Kabupaten Pandeglang. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan status perkembangan terdapat 5 desa berstatus desa maju,92 desa berstatus desa berkembang,177 desa berstatus desa tertinggal,dan 52 desa berstatus desa sangat tertinggal. Berdasarkan status resiliensi terdapat 16 desa berstatus desa resiliensi rendah,239 desa berstatus desa resiliensi sedang,dan 71 desa berstatus desa resiliensi tinggi. Berdasarkan status perkembangan dan resiliensi terdapat 4 desa masuk tipologi B (maju resiliensi sedang),1 desa masuk tipologi C (maju resilensi rendah),4 desa masuk tipologi D (berkembang resilensi tinggi),79 desa masuk tipologi E (berkembang resiliensi sedang),9 desa masuk tipologi F (berkembang resiliensi rendah),35 desa masuk tipologi G (tertinggal resiliensi tinggi),136 desa masuk tipologi H (tertinggal resiliensi sedang),6 desa masuk tipologi I (tertinggal resiliensi rendah),32 desa masuk tipologi J (sangat tertinggal resiliensi tinggi),dan 20 desa masuk tipologi K (sangat tertinggal resiliensi sedang).
关键词：village funds;village typology;resilience
其他关键词：dana desa;tipologi desa;resiliensi