首页    期刊浏览 2025年03月03日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Current use of the pelvic organ prolapse quantification system in clinical practice among Korean obstetrician-gynecologists
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Soo Rim Kim ; Dong Hoon Suh ; Myung Jae Jeon
  • 期刊名称:BMC Women's Health
  • 印刷版ISSN:1472-6874
  • 电子版ISSN:1472-6874
  • 出版年度:2021
  • 卷号:21
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:1-5
  • DOI:10.1186/s12905-021-01354-w
  • 出版社:BioMed Central
  • 摘要:To assess current use of the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification (POP-Q) system in clinical practice among Korean obstetrician-gynecologists. A web-based questionnaire was sent to 780 Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology members. The items evaluated in the questionnaire were demographic characteristics and current use of the POP-Q system in the evaluation of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and surgical decision-making. Differences between POP-Q users and nonusers were analyzed by using the two-sample t-test and chi-squared test. One hundred twenty-six members (16%) responded to the survey. Of the respondents, 48% reported using the POP-Q system in the evaluation of POP. Members who were female, urogynecologists, or performed a high volume of prolapse surgery were more likely to use the POP-Q system (p < 0.05). All but one of the POP-Q users reported using the specific criteria to determine whether each compartmental prolapse should be corrected during prolapse surgery. Most respondents used stage 2 or the hymen as a threshold for prolapse to be corrected for all compartments. Less than half of Korean obstetrician-gynecologists use the POP-Q system in the evaluation of POP. Almost all of POP-Q users make a surgical decision based on the results of the POP-Q examination.
  • 关键词:Evaluation;Pelvic organ prolapse;Pelvic organ prolapse quantification system;Surgical decision-making
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有