文章基本信息

标题：Putting relational thinking to work in sustainability science – reply to Raymond et al.
本地全文：下载
作者：Simon West ; L. Jamila Haider ; Sanna Stålhammar 等
期刊名称：Ecosystems and People
印刷版ISSN：2639-5908
电子版ISSN：2639-5916
出版年度：2021
卷号：17
期号：1
页码：108-113
DOI：10.1080/26395916.2021.1898477
出版社：Taylor & Francis Group
摘要：We welcome Raymond et al.’s invitation to further discuss the ‘pragmatics’ of relational thinking in sustainability science. We clarify that relational approaches provide distinct theoretical and methodological resources that may be adopted on their own, or used to enrich other approaches, including systems research. We situate Raymond et al.’s characterization of relational thinking in a broader landscape of differing approaches to mobilizing ‘relationality’ in sustainability science. A key contribution of relational thinking in the process-relational, pragmatist and post-structural traditions is the focus on the generation and use of concepts. This focus is proving methodologically useful for sustainability scientists. We caution against viewing the generation of concepts purely in terms of ‘applying the knife’ to ‘divide components.’ Relational thinking offers alternatives more congruent with complexity: away from an ‘external’ actor cutting away at the world with an ‘either/or’ logic, towards an ‘immersed’ actor contributing generatively within it using a ‘both/and not only’ logic. The pragmatics of relational thinking will vary according to purposes. We describe two possible pathways for using relational thinking in research practice – (i) working forwards from relations, and (ii) working backwards from existing concepts – and discuss how relational thinking can contribute to complexity-oriented visions of ‘solutions-oriented sustainability science.’.
关键词：Relational ontology ; leverage points ; human-nature connection ; relational values ; complex adaptive systems ; social-ecological systems ; transformations