首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月02日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:The relationship between cultural tightness–looseness and COVID-19 cases and deaths: a global analysis
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Michele J Gelfand ; Joshua Conrad Jackson ; Xinyue Pan
  • 期刊名称:The Lancet Planetary Health
  • 电子版ISSN:2542-5196
  • 出版年度:2021
  • 卷号:5
  • 期号:3
  • 页码:1-10
  • DOI:10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30301-6
  • 出版社:Elsevier
  • 摘要:BACKGROUND :The COVID-19 pandemic is a global health crisis, yet certain countries have had far more success in limiting COVID-19 cases and deaths. We suggest that collective threats require a tremendous amount of coordination, and that strict adherence to social norms is a key mechanism that enables groups to do so. Here we examine how the strength of social norms-or cultural tightness-looseness-was associated with countries' success in limiting cases and deaths by October, 2020. We expected that tight cultures, which have strict norms and punishments for deviance, would have fewer cases and deaths per million as compared with loose cultures, which have weaker norms and are more permissive. METHODS :We estimated the relationship between cultural tightness-looseness and COVID-19 case and mortality rates as of Oct 16, 2020, using ordinary least squares regression. We fit a series of stepwise models to capture whether cultural tightness-looseness explained variation in case and death rates controlling for under-reporting, demographics, geopolitical factors, other cultural dimensions, and climate. FINDINGS :The results indicated that, compared with nations with high levels of cultural tightness, nations with high levels of cultural looseness are estimated to have had 4·99 times the number of cases (7132 per million vs 1428 per million, respectively) and 8·71 times the number of deaths (183 per million vs 21 per million, respectively), taking into account a number of controls. A formal evolutionary game theoretic model suggested that tight groups coordinate much faster and have higher survival rates than loose groups. The results suggest that tightening social norms might confer an evolutionary advantage in times of collective threat. INTERPRETATION :Nations that are tight and abide by strict norms have had more success than those that are looser as of the October, 2020. New interventions are needed to help countries tighten social norms as they continue to battle COVID-19 and other collective threats. FUNDING :Office of Naval Research, US Navy. Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有