首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月02日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Who's Learning? Using Demographics in EDM Research
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Luc Paquette ; Jaclyn Ocumpaugh ; Ziyue Li
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Educational Data Mining
  • 电子版ISSN:2157-2100
  • 出版年度:2020
  • 卷号:12
  • 期号:3
  • 页码:1-30
  • DOI:10.5281/zenodo.4143612
  • 出版社:International EDM Society
  • 摘要:The growing use of machine learning for the data-driven study of social issues and the implementation of data-driven decision processes has required researchers to re-examine the often implicit assumption that data-driven models are neutral and free of biases. The careful examination of machine-learned models has identified examples of how existing biases can inadvertently be perpetuated in fields such as criminal justice, where failing to account for racial prejudices in the prediction of recidivism can perpetuate or exasperate them, and natural language processing, where algorithms trained on human languages corpora have been shown to reproduce strong biases in gendered descriptions. These examples highlight the importance of thinking about how biases might impact the study of educational data and how data-driven models used in educational contexts may perpetuate inequalities. To understand this question, we ask whether and how demographic information, including age, educational level, gender, race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status (SES), and geographical location, is used in Educational Data Mining (EDM) research. Specifically, we conduct a systematic survey of the last five years of EDM publications that investigates whether and how demographic information about the students is reported in EDM research and how this information is used to 1) investigate issues related to demographics, 2) use the information as input features for data-driven analyses, or 3) to test and validate models. This survey shows that, although a majority of publications reported at least one category of demographic information, the frequency of reporting for different categories of demographic information is very uneven (ranging from 5% to 59%), and only 15% of publications used demographic information in their analyses.
  • 关键词:machine learning bias;equity;fairness;meta-analysis
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有