首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月05日 星期四
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:How to deal with an "essentially contested concept" on the field? Sampling social innovations through the Delphi method
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Ela Callorda Fossati ; Florence Degavre ; Marthe Nyssens
  • 期刊名称:European Public & Social Innovation Review
  • 电子版ISSN:2529-9824
  • 出版年度:2017
  • 卷号:2
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:45-58
  • DOI:10.31637/epsir.17-1.4
  • 出版社:Universidad del País Vasco
  • 摘要:How to select cases in social innovation research? Sampling units of analysis is indeed a challenging methodological question since social innovation theory is controversial and fragmented. In the absence of any database and given the limits of conventional techniques, sampling is only possible through participative methods that make sense of opposing perceptions and contestedness. This article presents the Delphi method and its related principles of expertise, iterative consultation and consensus forming and shows how it served to identify a pool of cases of social innovation, sort them out and finally establish a sample of social innovations in a partnership research on innovative practices in domiciliary eldercare.
  • 关键词:Social innovation Essentially contested concept Transdisciplinary research Multiple-case study design Sampling Consensus-based methods Delphi method Eldercare
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有