文章基本信息

标题：Bi-cultural, bi-national benchmarking and assessment of clinical reasoning in Obstetrics and Gynaecology
本地全文：下载
作者：Paul Duggan ; Patricia Monnier ; Alphonse Roex 等
期刊名称：MedEdPublish
电子版ISSN：2312-7996
出版年度：2016
卷号：5
期号：1
页码：1-11
DOI：10.15694/mep.2016.000025
出版社：Association for Medical Education in Europe (AMEE)
摘要：Background: The Script Concordance Test (SCT) is being increasingly used in professional development in clinical reasoning (CR) in postgraduate medicine. On-line delivery favours multi-institutional collaboration.Objectives: To establish if: 1) SCT questions developed in the French-speaking University of Montreal were readily adaptable for use in the English-speaking University of Adelaide 2) expert reference panels (ERP) from both institutions could be used interchangeably 3) student cohorts would perform similarly in the same test.Study Design: 82 SCT questions based on 27 clinical cases in Obstetrics and Gynaecology were developed in Montreal and run in a volunteer cohort of year 3 and year 4 medical students (n=154). Local faculty translated all questions, selecting 31 based on 17 clinical cases for use in summative examinations a year 5 student cohort in Adelaide (n=123).Results: Mean (SD) percentage scores using each ERP key were: 74.2 (6.4) versus 73.3 (6.9), p<0.001 for Adelaide students and 72.5 (7.8) versus 70.6 (8.8), p<0.001 for Montreal students. The correlation coefficients were ≥ 0.928 (p<0.001).Conclusions: Student cohorts performed similarly regardless of which ERP key was used. With appropriate editorial control, SCT’s can be effectively shared between French and English-speaking institutions located in different hemispheres. Potential advantages include the creation of an international database of assessment items, benchmarking and cost sharing.
关键词：script concordance test; international collaboration; bilingual collaboration; medical student assessment; clinical reasoning