首页    期刊浏览 2025年03月03日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Faculty support and student engagement in undergraduate engineering
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Denise M. Wilson ; Lauren Summers ; Joanna Wright
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning
  • 印刷版ISSN:2397-7604
  • 出版年度:2020
  • 卷号:13
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:83-101
  • DOI:10.1108/JRIT-02-2020-0011
  • 摘要:Purpose This study investigated how behavioral and emotional forms of engagement are associated with faculty support and student-faculty interactions among engineering students. Design/methodology/approach Quantitative research methods were used to analyze survey data from 781 undergraduates in seven large undergraduate engineering courses. Linear hierarchical regression models were used to evaluate the relationships between demographics (gender, race/ethnicity, family education, US status and transfer status) and student engagement and between faculty behaviors and engagement. Findings Faculty support was consistently, significantly and positively linked to all forms of student engagement, while student-faculty interactions were significantly and positively linked to effort and positive emotional engagement and negatively linked to attention and (an absence of) negative emotional engagement. Gender, race/ethnicity, international student status and transfer status significantly predicted at least one form of engagement. Research limitations/implications Although this was a single institution study and cross-sectional, the findings suggest that faculty support and student-faculty interactions, while important for engagement, have different effects on different types of students. Faculty and teacher professional development efforts should raise awareness of these differences in order to enhance diversity and inclusion in engineering courses and curricula at all levels. Originality/value The analysis of behavioral and emotional forms of engagement represents more of a motivational lens on engagement in contrast to the traditional focus on time-on-task or time spent in fruitful educational practices, as is the norm with much of the engagement literature in higher education.
  • 其他摘要:Purpose

    This study investigated how behavioral and emotional forms of engagement are associated with faculty support and student-faculty interactions among engineering students.

    Design/methodology/approach

    Quantitative research methods were used to analyze survey data from 781 undergraduates in seven large undergraduate engineering courses. Linear hierarchical regression models were used to evaluate the relationships between demographics (gender, race/ethnicity, family education, US status and transfer status) and student engagement and between faculty behaviors and engagement.

    Findings

    Faculty support was consistently, significantly and positively linked to all forms of student engagement, while student-faculty interactions were significantly and positively linked to effort and positive emotional engagement and negatively linked to attention and (an absence of) negative emotional engagement. Gender, race/ethnicity, international student status and transfer status significantly predicted at least one form of engagement.

    Research limitations/implications

    Although this was a single institution study and cross-sectional, the findings suggest that faculty support and student-faculty interactions, while important for engagement, have different effects on different types of students. Faculty and teacher professional development efforts should raise awareness of these differences in order to enhance diversity and inclusion in engineering courses and curricula at all levels.

    Originality/value

    The analysis of behavioral and emotional forms of engagement represents more of a motivational lens on engagement in contrast to the traditional focus on time-on-task or time spent in fruitful educational practices, as is the norm with much of the engagement literature in higher education.

  • 关键词:Faculty support; STEM; Engineering; Engagement; Emotion; Motivation
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有