文章基本信息

标题：Evaluation2 – Evaluating the national evaluation system in South Africa: What has been achieved in the first 5 years?
本地全文：下载
作者：Ian Goldman ; Carol N. Deliwe ; Stephen Taylor 等
期刊名称：African Evaluation Journal
印刷版ISSN：2310-4988
电子版ISSN：2306-5133
出版年度：2019
卷号：7
期号：1
页码：11-21
DOI：10.4102/aej.v7i1.400
出版社：AOSIS
摘要：South Africa has pioneered national evaluation systems (NESs) along with Canada, Mexico, Colombia, Chile, Uganda and Benin. South Africa’s National Evaluation Policy Framework (NEPF) was approved by Cabinet in November 2011. An evaluation of the NES started in September 2016. Objectives: The purpose of the evaluation was to assess whether the NES had had an impact on the programmes and policies evaluated, the departments involved and other key stakeholders; and to determine how the system needs to be strengthened. Method: The evaluation used a theory-based approach, including international benchmarking, five national and four provincial case studies, 112 key informant interviews, a survey with 86 responses and a cost-benefit analysis of a sample of evaluations. Results: Since 2011, 67 national evaluations have been completed or are underway within the NES, covering over $10 billion of government expenditure. Seven of South Africa’s nine provinces have provincial evaluation plans and 68 of 155 national and provincial departments have departmental evaluation plans. Hence, the system has spread widely but there are issues of quality and the time it takes to do evaluations. It was difficult to assess use but from the case studies it did appear that instrumental and process use were widespread. There appears to be a high return on evaluations of between R7 and R10 per rand invested. Conclusion: The NES evaluation recommendations on strengthening the system ranged from legislation to strengthen the mandate, greater resources for the NES, strengthening capacity development, communication and the tracking of use.
关键词：evaluation; national evaluation system; evaluation system; South Africa; cost-effectiveness; M&E; evaluation capacity development; institutionalisation; evaluation use; evidence use