文章基本信息

标题：Comparing the Impact of Programming Assessment Type: In-Class Vs Take-Home
本地全文：下载
作者：Oscar Karnalim ; Gisela Kurniawati ; Sendy Ferdian Sujadi 等
期刊名称：International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy
电子版ISSN：2192-4880
出版年度：2020
卷号：10
期号：4
页码：125-132
DOI：10.3991/ijep.v10i4.13509
出版社：International Society for Engineering Education (IGIP) in cooperation with Kassel University Press GmbH
摘要：In engineering education, educational technologies and teaching interventions are often used to maintain the student retention high. Most of them are strongly related to either in-class or take-home assessment. This paper compares the impact of both assessments on student performance for one academic semester. The findings are expected to re-align the focus of educational technology and teaching intervention research. Fifty-five laboratory sessions were analysed, involving five Introductory Programming classes with a total of 87 Information Technology and Information System undergraduates. The study shows that, by considering only significant changes, in-class assessment leads to higher assessment mark as the students can easily seek help and focus on the tasks. Technical problems are also unlikely to occur as the classroom (or the laboratory in our case) is well-facilitated.
关键词：assessment type; programming; educational technology; teaching intervention; engineering education