摘要:Englacial conduits act as water pathways to feed
surface meltwater into the subglacial drainage system. A
change of meltwater into the subglacial drainage system
can alter the glacier’s dynamics. Between 2012 and 2019,
repeated 25 MHz ground-penetrating radar (GPR) surveys
were carried out over an active englacial conduit network
within the ablation area of the temperate Rhonegletscher,
Switzerland. In 2012, 2016, and 2017 GPR measurements
were carried out only once a year, and an englacial conduit
was detected in 2017. In 2018 and 2019 the repetition survey
rate was increased to monitor seasonal variations in the detected englacial conduit. The resulting GPR data were processed using an impedance inversion workflow to compute
GPR reflection coefficients and layer impedances, which are
indicative of the conduit’s infill material. The spatial and
temporal evolution of the reflection coefficients also provided insights into the morphology of the Rhonegletscher’s
englacial conduit network. During the summer melt seasons,
we observed an active, water-filled, sediment-transporting
englacial conduit network that yielded large negative GPR
reflection coefficients (< −0.2). The GPR surveys conducted
during the summer provided evidence that the englacial conduit was 15–20m ± 6m wide, ∼ 0.4m ± 0.35m thick, ∼
250m ± 6m long with a shallow inclination (2◦
), and having a sinusoidal shape from the GPR data. We speculate that
extensional hydraulic fracturing is responsible for the formation of the conduit as a result of the conduit network geometry observed and from borehole observations. Synthetic GPR
waveform modelling using a thin water-filled conduit showed
that a conduit thickness larger than 0.4 m (0.3× minimum
wavelength) thick can be correctly identified using 25 MHz
GPR data. During the winter periods, the englacial conduit
no longer transports water and either physically closed or became very thin (< 0.1 m), thereby producing small negative
reflection coefficients that are caused by either sediments lying within the closed conduit or water within the very thin
conduit. Furthermore, the englacial conduit reactivated during the following melt season at an identical position as in
the previous year.