出版社:Institute of Philosophy of the Slovak Academy of Sciences
摘要:This paper aims to move the debate over the status of the conflict between emotion and judgement forward by refuting three implicit claims: that conflict between emotion and judgement is always to be avoided;that any conflict should always be resolved and,moreover,that it should be resolved immediately;that judgement should usually take priority in any resolution.Refutation of these three claims leads to recognition of the wide variety of different cases of conflict between emotion and judgement;examination of these cases is aided by consideration of the social context in which the conflicts occur.