文章基本信息

标题：TESTING KUZNETS ’ HYPOTHESIS FOR RUSS IAN REGIONS: TRENDS AND INTERPRETATIONS
本地全文：下载
作者：J. R. Alm ; R. A. Grigoryev ; M. V. Kramin 等
期刊名称：Èkonomika Regiona
印刷版ISSN：2072-6414
电子版ISSN：2411-1406
出版年度：2016
卷号：12
期号：2
页码：560-568
DOI：10.17059/2016–2–20
语种：English
出版社：Institute of economics of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences
摘要：The paper established a number of "stylized facts", one of which is a confirmation of the S. Kuznets’ hypothesis of the nonlinear dependence between the degree of inequality in income distribution and welfare economic systems on the example of a group of Russian regions for the period 2002–2012. It is shown that, for a given sample, the welfare and economic growth factors amplify their influence on inequality in income distribution in the post-crisis period. The monotonous growth of income inequality which was observed before the crisis of 2008 is slowing in the process of raising the per capita gross regional product (GRP) during the post-crisis period, and for the foreseeable future, in some regions, its direction can be reversed, while maintaining a trend of socio-economic development. Despite the persistence over time of a convex nature of S. Kuznets’ curve for Russian regional data, its parameters changed during the reporting 2002–2012 period. The maximum point of the curve shifts to the left, its convexity increases. These facts indicate that the income inequality growth of the Russian regions’ as a result of growth of per capita GRP is slowing. For some regions in the post-crisis period, the income inequality does not grow with the growth of per capita GRP, or it even reduces. This fact can be attributed to the implementation of the Russian federal socially oriented projects and programs in recent years. The results can be used for the development of regional economic policy in order to regulate the level of income distribution inequality in the regions of Russia.
关键词：inequality of income distribution;economic growth;Gini coefficient;competitiveness of regions;regression modeling;gross regional product;income;post-crisis period;regional policy;poverty reduction