标题:Evaluation of student perceptions with 2 interprofessional assessment tools—the Collaborative Healthcare Interdisciplinary Relationship Planning instrument and the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale—following didactic and clinical learning experiences in t
期刊名称:Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions
电子版ISSN:1975-5937
出版年度:2019
卷号:16
期号:1
页码:1-7
DOI:10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.35
语种:English
出版社:Korea Health Insurance Licensing Examination Institute
摘要:Purpose:This study investigated changes in students’ attitudes using 2 validated interprofessional survey instruments—the Collabora_x0002_tive Healthcare Interdisciplinary Relationship Planning (CHIRP) instrument and the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale (IPAS)—before and after didactic and clinical cohorts.Methods:Students from 7 colleges/schools participated in didactic and clinical cohorts during the 2017–2018 year.Didactic cohorts experienced 2 interactive sessions 6 months apart,while clinical cohorts experienced 4 outpatient clinical sessions once monthly.For the baseline and post-cohort assessments,865 students were randomly assigned to complete either the 14-item CHIRP or the 27-item IPAS.The Pittman test using permutations of linear ranks was used to determine differences in the score distribution between the base?line and post-cohort assessments.Pooled results were compared for the CHIRP total score and the IPAS total and subdomain scores.For each score,3 comparisons were made simultaneously:overall baseline versus post-didactic cohort,overall baseline versus post-clini?cal cohort,and post-didactic cohort versus post-clinical cohort.Alpha was adjusted to 0.0167 to account for simultaneous comparisons.Results:The baseline and post-cohort survey response rates were 62.4% and 65.9% for CHIRP and 58.7% and 58.1% for IPAS,respectively.The post-clinical cohort scores for the IPAS subdomain of teamwork,roles,and responsibilities were significantly higher than the baseline and post-didactic cohort scores.No differences were seen for the remaining IPAS subdomain scores or the CHIRP instrument total score.Conclusion:The IPAS instrument may discern changes in student attitudes in the subdomain of teamwork,roles,and responsibilities following short-term clinical experiences involving diverse interprofessional team members.
关键词:Purpose:This study investigated changes in students’ attitudes using 2 validated interprofessional survey instruments—the Collabora_x0002_tive Healthcare Interdisciplinary Relationship Planning (CHIRP) instrument and the Interprofessional Attitudes Scale (IPAS)—before and after didactic and clinical cohorts.Methods:Students from 7 colleges/schools participated in didactic and clinical cohorts during the 2017–2018 year.Didactic cohorts experienced 2 interactive sessions 6 months apart,while clinical cohorts experienced 4 outpatient clinical sessions once monthly.For the baseline and post-cohort assessments,865 students were randomly assigned to complete either the 14-item CHIRP or the 27-item IPAS.The Pittman test using permutations of linear ranks was used to determine differences in the score distribution between the base?line and post-cohort assessments.Pooled results were compared for the CHIRP total score and the IPAS total and subdomain scores.For each score,3 comparisons were made simultaneously:overall baseline versus post-didactic cohort,overall baseline versus post-clini?cal cohort,and post-didactic cohort versus post-clinical cohort.Alpha was adjusted to 0.0167 to account for simultaneous comparisons.Results:The baseline and post-cohort survey response rates were 62.4% and 65.9% for CHIRP and 58.7% and 58.1% for IPAS,respectively.The post-clinical cohort scores for the IPAS subdomain of teamwork,roles,and responsibilities were significantly higher than the baseline and post-didactic cohort scores.No differences were seen for the remaining IPAS subdomain scores or the CHIRP instrument total score.Conclusion:The IPAS instrument may discern changes in student attitudes in the subdomain of teamwork,roles,and responsibilities following short-term clinical experiences involving diverse interprofessional team members.