文章基本信息

标题：Comparing Traditional Learning Materials with Those Created with Instructional Design and Universal Design for Learning Attributes: The Students’ Perspective
本地全文：下载
作者：Peter Fenrich ; Tim Carson ; Mark Overgaard 等
期刊名称：BCES Conference Books
印刷版ISSN：1314-4693
电子版ISSN：2534-8426
出版年度：2018
卷号：16
期号：1
页码：143-149
语种：English
出版社：Bulgarian Comparative Education Society (BCES)
摘要：There are foundational universal design for learning (UDL) principles that support accessibility and inclusivity that can be incorporated into instructional materials. Creating instructional materials that are accessible and inclusive is a comparatively new challenge that is gaining awareness. A problem is that most professors do not know how to design for accessibility and inclusivity. Universal design for learning is also referred to as universal instructional design. This paper discusses the instructional design and UDL principles designed into instructional materials that were created to teach piping trades students how to solder and braze copper pipe. A summative quantitative and qualitative analysis was conducted to determine whether the students felt that the new materials had more instructional design and UDL attributes than the original materials. The findings showed that there were significant differences between the instructional design and UDL attributes of the new materials as compared to the original materials. There were no significant differences between some of the attributes.
关键词：universal design for learning;accessibility;inclusivity;trades training;universal instructional design