首页    期刊浏览 2025年02月22日 星期六
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Can diagnostic problem-solving competences of car mechatronics be validly assessed using a paper-pencil test?
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Stephan Abele
  • 期刊名称:Journal of Technical Education
  • 电子版ISSN:2198-0306
  • 出版年度:2016
  • 卷号:4
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:190-211
  • 出版社:Universität Stuttgart
  • 摘要:In this study, an authentic paper-based key-feature test for electrotechnical diagnostic problem-solving competence was developed, administered to car mechatronic apprentices ( N = 206) and validated using diagnostic problem-solving scores. It was hypothesized that the paper-based test scores represent the same construct as the problem-solving scores. The written test turned out to have a relatively high reliability (EAP/PV = .75). Additionally, it was found that the paper-based scores and problem-solving scores were highly correlated ( r = .76) but represented empirically distinct dimensions. Presumably, the written test especially covered diagnostic knowledge and failed to cover other relevant subcomponents of diagnostic problem-solving competence. It is argued that this unexpected finding might be caused by construct underrepresentation and construct-irrelevant variance of the paper-based key-feature test.
  • 其他摘要:In this study, an authentic paper-based key-feature test for electrotechnical diagnostic problem-solving competence was developed, administered to car mechatronic apprentices ( N = 206) and validated using diagnostic problem-solving scores. It was hypothesized that the paper-based test scores represent the same construct as the problem-solving scores. The written test turned out to have a relatively high reliability (EAP/PV = .75). Additionally, it was found that the paper-based scores and problem-solving scores were highly correlated ( r = .76) but represented empirically distinct dimensions. Presumably, the written test especially covered diagnostic knowledge and failed to cover other relevant subcomponents of diagnostic problem-solving competence. It is argued that this unexpected finding might be caused by construct underrepresentation and construct-irrelevant variance of the paper-based key-feature test.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有