首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月02日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Including diverse knowledges and worldviews in environmental assessment and planning: the Brazilian Amazon Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land case
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Fernanda Ayaviri Matuk ; Jelle Hendrik Behagel ; Felipe Nogueira Bello Simas
  • 期刊名称:Ecosystems and People
  • 印刷版ISSN:2639-5908
  • 电子版ISSN:2639-5916
  • 出版年度:2020
  • 卷号:16
  • 期号:1
  • 页码:95-113
  • DOI:10.1080/26395916.2020.1722752
  • 出版社:Taylor & Francis Group
  • 摘要:The concepts of ‘ecosystem services’ (ES) and ‘nature’s contributions to people’ (NCP) inform environmental frameworks that set out to include Indigenous and Local Knowledge systems (ILK) and worldviews in policy and planning processes. These frameworks aim to enhance biodiversity conservation and human well-being in a legitimate and effective way. In this article, we explore how the concept of People’s Contributions to Nature (PCN) is complementary to NCP. We use it to investigate challenges that planners and locals face in realizing the legitimate inclusion of diverse knowledges and worldviwes that account for people and ecosystems in a relational way. We introduce a case study where planners drew on ES and NCP and used participatory methods to implement a REDD+ policy in the Kaxinawá Nova Olinda Indigenous Land (Acre-Brazil). We find that both Kaxinawás and planners emphasize both NCP and PCN in their discourses. Nevertheless, differences between knowledge systems and disciplines, uneven power relations between Kaxinawás and planners, and an under-consideration of PCN by global frameworks challenge the legitimate inclusion of the Kaxinawá knowlege and worldviews to craft assessment and planning. We conclude that by explicitly addressing these challenges, science-policy interfaces can further advance knowledge legitimacy and policy effectiveness.
  • 关键词:Indigenous and local knowledge ; nature’s contributions to people ; ecosystem services ; participatory approaches ; resource management ; assessment
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有