首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月02日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Cold-season Production of CO 2 in Arctic Soils: Can Laboratory and Field Estimates Be Reconciled through a Simple Modeling Approach?
  • 其他标题:Cold-season Production of CO 2 in Arctic Soils: Can Laboratory and Field Estimates Be Reconciled through a Simple Modeling Approach?
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:Joshua P. Schimel ; Jace Fahnestock ; Gary Michaelson
  • 期刊名称:Arctic, Antarctic, and Alpine Research
  • 印刷版ISSN:1523-0430
  • 电子版ISSN:1938-4246
  • 出版年度:2006
  • 卷号:38
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:249-256
  • DOI:10.1657/1523-0430(2006)38[249:CPOCIA]2.0.CO%3B2
  • 摘要:Microbial activity in arctic tundra soils has been evaluated through both lab incubations and field flux measurements. To determine whether these different measurement approaches can be directly linked to each other, we developed a simple model of soil microbial CO 2 production during the cold season in tussock tundra, moss tundra, and wet meadow tundra in the Alaskan Arctic. The model incorporated laboratory-based estimates of microbial temperature responses at sub-zero temperatures with field measurements of C stocks through the soil profile and daily temperature measurements at the sites. Estimates of total CO 2 production overestimated in situ cold season CO 2 fluxes for the studied sites by as much as two- to threefold, suggesting that either CO 2 produced in situ does not efflux during the cold season or that microbial respiration potentials are constrained by some other factor in situ. Average estimated winter CO 2 production was near 120 g C m −2 in moist tundra and 60 g C m −2 in wet meadow tundra. Production was strongly seasonal, with most of the winter CO 2 production happening early in the winter, before soils froze completely through. Roughly two-thirds of the total estimated CO 2 production was from deep soils, largely mineral soils, in contrast to growing season CO 2 dynamics.
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有