摘要:Dalam rangka menjaga dan menegakkan kehormatan, keluhuran martabat,
serta perilaku hakim diperlukan pengawasan terhadap perilaku hakim
konstitusi agar sesuai kode etik dan pedoman perilaku sehingga setiap
putusan hakim dilaksanakan dalam rangka menegakkan hukum dan keadilan
berdasarkan Pancasila dan UUD Tahun 1945 sebagai politik hukum
permanen pengawasan hakim konstitusi. Sedangkan politik hukum insidentil
yang menjadi pilihan adalah; a) perilaku hakim Konstitusi diawasi oleh
Dewan Etik yang dibentuk MK, sedangkan terhadap hakim terlapor atau
terduga melakukan pelanggaran kode etika dan/atau pedoman perilaku
hakim Konstitusi dibentuk Majelis Kehormatan Hakim Konstitusi yang
pembentukannya diusulkan Dewan Etik, dengan tugas melaksanakan dan
berfungsi sebagai peradilan etik; dan b) putusan MK tidak dapat dilakukan
pengawasan judisial sebagaimana halnya pengawasan putusan pengadilan
yang berada di lingkungan MA melalui mekanisme upaya hukum (biasa dan luar biasa). Namun demikian, putusan MK dapat diawasi masyarakat melalui
monitoring terhadap pelaksanaan putusan dimaksud, termasuk koreksi
melalui kegiatan akademik tetapi tidak dapat merubah putusan.
其他摘要:In order to preserve and uphold the honor, dignity, and the behavior of the judge is required to supervise the attitude constitutional judge to fit the code of ethics, so that each judge's ruling will be implemented in order to enforce the law and justice based on Pancasila and the Constitution 1945 as a permanent legal political for supervision of the constitutional judges. Whereas legal politics incidental that becomes choice among others: a) Behavior of Constitutional Judges are overseen by the Board of Ethics established by the Constitutional Court, and for the reported judges or suspected violations of ethic codes of Constitutional Judges formed by Honorary Council of the Constitutional Judges whose creation was proposed by Ethics Council, with the task of implementing and serves as ethic judicial; and b) there is no judicial supervision against Constitutional Court's decision as well as supervision of a court decision which was in the Supreme Court through the mechanism of legal remedies (ordinary and extraordinary).