文章基本信息

标题：Student Response Systems: a rationale for their use and a comparison of some cloud based tools
本地全文：下载
作者：Martin Compton ; Jason Allen
期刊名称：Compass: Journal of Learning and Teaching
印刷版ISSN：2044-0073
电子版ISSN：2044-0081
出版年度：2018
卷号：11
期号：1
页码：1-19
DOI：10.21100/compass.v11i1.696
出版社：University of Greenwich, Educational Development Unit
摘要：Student Response Systems (SRS) take many forms but we argue that there are compelling reasons to use some form of SRS in lectures and seminars at some points in the year, irrespective of subject taught and setting. Deciding which tool to use can be a challenge which is why we have selected a range of cloud based SRS types with varying functions and levels of difficulty and offer reviews of each here using the 'SCORE' analysis system enabling the reader to compare the perspectives of experienced users of each tool before trialling one or more of them. The tools we review here are: Todaysmeet, Slido, Polleverywhere, Mentimeter, Socrative, Kahoot and Zeetings.
其他关键词：technology; voting tools; Student response; voting; software; cloud; lectures; seminars; interactive; engagement