文章基本信息

标题：The Use of Scientific Writing Heuristics (SWH) to Build Rebuttal Abilities in Scientific Argumentation
本地全文：下载
作者：Anisa Anisa ; Ari Widodo ; Riandi Riandi 等
期刊名称：Scientiae Educatia
印刷版ISSN：2303-1530
电子版ISSN：2527-7596
出版年度：2019
卷号：8
期号：2
页码：180-195
DOI：10.24235/sc.educatia.v8i2.5131
出版社：IAIN Syekh Nurjati Cirebon
摘要：The research aims to build and measure students' abilities in rebuttal using the Scientific Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach. This mixed-method research method was carried out for 5 months on 38 students, at a high school in West Java, Indonesia. The issue of socio-scientific genetics is given the theme of Genetic Modified Organisms with rebuttal measurements using the updated Toulmin argumentation framework. Qualitative and quantitative data are taken in this article in the form of argumentation before, during, and after treatment; coupled with deep interviews and questionnaires as well as observation of discussions. The results showed there were changes and improvements in rebuttal ability by 27.15% (30 students). The distribution of the strength of evidence is at most level 2 at 48.7% with a weak category, at level 3 at 30.8% with a strong enough category, at level 4 at 20.5% with a strong category.
其他摘要：The research aims to build and measure students' abilities in rebuttal using the Scientific Writing Heuristic (SWH) approach. This mixed-method research method was carried out for 5 months on 38 students, at a high school in West Java, Indonesia. The issue of socio-scientific genetics is given the theme of Genetic Modified Organisms with rebuttal measurements using the updated Toulmin argumentation framework. Qualitative and quantitative data are taken in this article in the form of argumentation before, during, and after treatment; coupled with deep interviews and questionnaires as well as observation of discussions. The results showed there were changes and improvements in rebuttal ability by 27.15% (30 students). The distribution of the strength of evidence is at most level 2 at 48.7% with a weak category, at level 3 at 30.8% with a strong enough category, at level 4 at 20.5% with a strong category.
关键词：Argumentation ;Rebuttal ;Scientific writing heuristic ;Socio Scientific Issues ;TAP revised framework
其他关键词：Argumentation; Rebuttal; Scientific writing heuristic; Socio Scientific Issues; TAP revised framework