文章基本信息

标题：PENGARUHTIME BUDGET PRESSURE, KOMPLEKSITAS AUDIT, DAN SKEPTISISME PROFESIONAL AUDITOR TERHADAP KUALITAS HASIL PEMERIKSAAN (STUDI EMPIRIS PADA INSPEKTORAT SE-PULAU LOMBOK)
本地全文：下载
作者：Lalu Agus Sudrajat ; Ahmad Rifai ; Endar Pituringsih 等
期刊名称：Jurnal Akuntansi Aktual
印刷版ISSN：2087-9695
电子版ISSN：2580-1015
出版年度：2015
卷号：3
期号：2
页码：135-145
出版社：Universitas Negeri Malang
摘要：The purpose of this study is to analyze and to obtain empirical evidence concerning the influence of time budget pressure, the complexity of the audit, and the auditor’s professional skepticism on the quality of examination results of the Inspectorate Local Government in Lombok Island. The number of population in this study is 125 respondents, contain of the auditors and the local government supervisor of the Inspectorate Local Government in Lombok Island, while the number of respondents are 106. Before the hypothesis test, firstly the validity and reliability test is applied, and followed with the classical assumption test and multiple linear regression analysis. The result of this study shows that time budget pressure, the complexity of the audit, and the auditor’s professional skepticism give positive influence on the quality of the examination results of the Inspectorate Local Government in Lombok Island. Partially complexity of the audit and the auditor’s professional skepticism gives positive influence significantly, whereas time budget pressure has no significant influence. This is caused by the allocation of working hours on overtime hours can be done by the auditor, the auditor’s division of labor based on a fixed object and repeat inspection every year, the inspection team flexibility in audit work program within the budget allotted time, the auditor that the majority of respondents have more than 6 years of experience in the audit, the auditors step of career already arranged in a neat and professional education and ongoing training of auditors in the demands of his profession.
关键词：time budget pressure; complexity of the audit; the auditor’s professional skepticism; the quality of examination results