文章基本信息

标题：Claves para problematizar el concepto de institucionalización en los estudios disciplinares: una revisión crítica de la propuesta conceptual de David Altman
其他标题：Claves para problematizar el concepto de institucionalización en los estudios disciplinares: una revisión crítica de la propuesta conceptual de David Altman
本地全文：下载
作者：Sergio Angel Baquero ; Juan Carlos Rico Noguera ; Julián Andrés Caicedo Ortiz 等
期刊名称：Civitas
印刷版ISSN：1519-6089
电子版ISSN：1984-7289
出版年度：2019
卷号：19
期号：3
页码：504-522
DOI：10.15448/1984-7289.2019.3.33247
出版社：Faculdade de Filosofia e Ciências Humanas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul
摘要：This article proposes a critical view on, what is now conventional, the political science history in Latin America (Bulcourf et al., 2015; Leyva, 2013; Altman, 2005 among others). We problematize the direction that disciplinary studies has been taking in the region, manly influenced by the concept of “institutionalization”. This article states that the institutionalization concept suffers of two big problems to give account of the trajectories of regional political science: first, it does fall in what Sartori (1970) has called the “concept enlargement”; second, the concept forgets about the social complexity and the contextual root of disciplines. We concluded that thinking in a situated development of political science can contribute to the comprehension of regional discipline and to build a discipline transformation coherent with the needs of our countries and region.
关键词：Political science;Disciplinary studies;Institutionalization;Situated development;Conceptual turn.;Ciencia Política;Estudios disciplinares;Institucionalización;Desarrollo situado;Giro conceptual.;Ciência Política;Estudos disciplinares;Institucionalização;Desenvolvimento situado;Virada conceitual.