摘要:The aim of the paper is to stress the relationship between individual metacognitive
accuracy and academic performance. Moreover, we tested the relationship between
the accuracy, items diffi culty and bias score and exam results. Metacognitive
monitoring calibration of 100 university students was tested in exam settings, using
postdated confi dence judgments. Absolute local and global accuracy and total
bias score were related with test performance, diffi culty and types of the items:
multiple choice and open ended items. The most important results show local and
local inaccuracy or overconfi dence, but also an unexpected greater accuracy on
low performing subjects compared with there’s more performing counterparts.
The open ended items low, but positively correlate with metacognitive monitoring
inaccuracy, both local and global, a possible illustration of the hard-easy eff ect.
The bias score is globally negatively related with performance, but the more the
subjects respond to the diffi cult open-ended items, the lower the bias in selfappreciation.
We conclude that there is a global expected relationship between
test results and both accuracy and bias score. Also, particular results show a more
nuanced relationship between local and global accuracy, items diffi culty and type
and bias score. Some theoretical and methodological issues are discussed and
futures research direction is proposed.
关键词:metacognition; accuracy; overconfi dence; overestimation; university
students;