期刊名称:Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine
印刷版ISSN:1232-1966
电子版ISSN:1898-2263
出版年度:2018
卷号:25
期号:4
页码:1-7
DOI:10.26444/aaem/99561
出版社:Institute of Agricultural Medicine in Lublin
摘要:Ojective. To investigate respiratory health problems related to pesticide exposure in the inhabitants of agricultural areas.
Materials and method. This study included 252 participants prior to pesticide application and 66 participants from the
first group after pesticide application across four cotton farms. Symptom questionnaires were filled out by participants and
respiratory function tests were measured before and after pesticide exposure. In addition, PM10, PM2.5, air temperature, and
humidity were measured in all four farming villages before and after pesticide administration.
Results. PM10 and PM2.5 levels were significantly increased after pesticide application. After pesticide application, all
participants’ nose, throat, eye, and respiratory complaints increased significantly. Expected forced vital capacity (FVC) and
forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1
) percentage values decreased significantly. The rates of FVC and FEV1
values
lower than 80% were 23.5% and 22%, respectively, before pesticide application, and this rate increased to 42.4% and 43.1%,
respectively, after pesticide application. There was a significant negative correlation between PM10 levels and FVC, FEV1
,
and PEF values. After PM2.5 pesticide application, the risk of experiencing burning in the mouth, nose, and throat increased
by 2.3-fold (OR: 2.316), 2.6-fold for burning symptoms in the eyes (OR: 2.593), 2.1-fold for wheezing (OR: 2.153), and 2.2-fold
for chest tightness (OR: 2.211). With increased PM10 levels, the risk of chest tightness increased 1.1-fold (OR: 1.123).
Conclusions. After pesticide administration, the respiratory health of the participants deteriorated. Performing pesticide
applications in agriculture with harmless methods is the most important measure to be taken to protect public health.