文章基本信息

标题：Linguistic analysis of pediatric residency personal statements: gender differences
本地全文：下载
作者：Jessica C. Babal ; Aubrey D. Gower ; John G. Frohna 等
期刊名称：BMC Medical Education
印刷版ISSN：1472-6920
出版年度：2019
卷号：19
期号：1
页码：1-9
DOI：10.1186/s12909-019-1838-x
出版社：BioMed Central
摘要：All US residency programs require applicants to submit personal statements. Prior studies showed gender differences in personal statement writing, which has implications for gender bias in the application process, but previous studies have not considered the dual influence of specialty-specific values on personal statement writing by applicants of each gender. To understand gender differences in pediatric residency personal statements. From 2017 to 2018, we performed linguistic analysis of personal statements written by interviewees at a mid-size US pediatrics residency during two prior academic years. We assessed writing tone, communal language, and agentic language. We performed t-tests to evaluate for gender differences, p < 0.05. We analyzed personal statements from 85 male and 85 female interviewees. Average word count was 676 words. Personal statements demonstrated analytic writing style with authentic and positive emotional tone. We found no gender differences in communal language for social affiliation (p = 0.31), adjectives (p = 0.49), or orientation (p = 0.48), which deviates from typical gender norms for male language use. Males used agentic language of reward more frequently (p = 0.02). Findings suggest that social language is valued in pediatrics, a predominantly female specialty, regardless of applicant gender. Use of reward language by males is consistent with previous findings. Future studies should evaluate gender differences in residency applications across specialties to advance understanding of the role gender plays in the application process.
关键词：Linguistic analysis ; Gender ; Bias ; Residency ; Pediatrics