首页    期刊浏览 2024年12月02日 星期一
登录注册

文章基本信息

  • 标题:Planning Theory or Planning Theories? The Hydra Model and its Implications for Planning Education
  • 其他标题:Planning Theory or Planning Theories? The Hydra Model and its Implications for Planning Education
  • 本地全文:下载
  • 作者:António Ferreira ; Olivier Sykes ; Peter Batey
  • 期刊名称:Higher Education Pedagogies
  • 电子版ISSN:2375-2696
  • 出版年度:2009
  • 卷号:4
  • 期号:2
  • 页码:29-54
  • DOI:10.11120/jebe.2009.04020029
  • 出版社:Taylor and Francis Ltd
  • 摘要:This paper critically examines the idea that planning theory experiences major theoretical shifts. Through a consideration of contributions from several academics, it is shown that different theoretical standpoints in planning persist and coexist. A model is proposed to aid understanding of this situation: the Hydra Model. This model views planning as a discipline in which several standpoints maintain a competitive interaction. This is positive: it is the best way to promote lively dialogue and to develop new understandings. However it is considered negative for planners to adopt a single standpoint. Theories are presented as tools for good practice, not as something to which planners should commit. In aiming for the emergence of this type of planner — an individual capable of flowing from one theory to another according to a discretionary view of particular situations — some suggestions for planning education are presented.
  • 关键词:Paradigms ; Interdisciplinary ; Theory ; Polyrationality ; Planning Curriculum ; Invariance
国家哲学社会科学文献中心版权所有